| |
.
The Problem with
Know-It-Alls
by Tom Terez
Early in my career, I had a boss whose IQ seemed positively stratospheric. He flew
through college, acing courses like Advanced Statistics IV. He taught himself how
to play several musical instruments. He wrote computer programs as a hobby. He was
the kind of person who had fun fiddling with Rubik's Cube, and according to the office
chatter, he could solve it.
He also was a teacher, though not in the formal sense. Watching Jim in action, I
learned that there's a fine line between intelligence and intellectual arrogance.
My crash course began about six months into my job as a junior associate at a management
consulting firm. "I'd like you to read this," Jim said, handing me an article
titled "Hunters vs. Farmers." "I'm curious whether you think we should
be hunters or farmers." Then he walked away.
I was a newbie in the work world, eager to please. So I read that article again and
again and again. I studied it like a monk studying the Bible. I parsed phrases, searched
for themes, struggled to comprehend. And I prayed that my answer would be right.
My boss was the head of the small firm -- and by "head," I truly mean the
brains. He was a walking strategic plan, customer database, and performance-management
system all wrapped up in one. He was also a nice guy -- not the type to go around
cracking jokes and giving high-fives, but a friendly sort with a ready smile and
kind word.
The day came for our conversation about the hunters vs. farmers article. I sat up
straight and tried to look like the person with The Right Answer. Jim sat back with
assurance and cut to the chase: "So what do you think?"
"Well," I began, "the article was very interesting. The examples were
fascinating."
"Yeah, but what do you think? Should we be hunters or farmers?"
The article had described two models for a consulting firm. The hunter firm was made
up of independent sorts who pursued clients and projects much like the hunters of
the prehistoric age. Each was rewarded according to individual results. The farmer
firm was more collaborative, with the consultants working together to plant seeds
and slowly but steadily nurture the business. Rewards were a collective proposition.
"Both sides have merit," I said, sounding like someone giving testimony
to a grand jury. "It's a tough call. But overall, I'd say that the farmer model
makes more sense."
Jim wasted no time in responding. He sat up in his chair, smiled slightly, engaged
his massive brain, and went on to tell me why the hunter model was the right answer.
He talked and talked, citing the merits of healthy competition, extolling the virtues
of personal initiative, droning on about self-sufficiency.
The more he talked, the less I absorbed. All I could hear was my own internal voice,
and it was blaring like a car alarm: know-it-all, know-it-all, know-it-all! I waited
for his lips to stop moving, then I agreed profusely with everything he had said.
"Let's have some more chats like this," he said.
"Sounds good," I responded. Yeah, uh-huh.
Returning to my cubicle, I resolved never to get suckered into another one-way conversation.
I remained friendly with my boss, yet distant. I stopped asking questions and playing
the devil's advocate. I did exactly as I was told, to the point of turning off my
brain.
And ever since, my ears have been extra-sensitive to know-it-alls. I've come to appreciate
the sharp difference between taking a stand and closing your mind. Between having
an answer and believing that you have the answer.
Time and again I've seen how know-it-alls shut down dialogue. People feel that if
they take different points of view, their all-knowing colleague will just refill
the bellows and emit more verbal air. Good decisions require give-and-take. Know-it-alls
just take.
If you're dealing with your own know-it-all boss or coworker and feel inclined to
hunker down as I did, don't. There are better approaches. At the risk of sounding
like a know-it-all myself, let me list a few:
- Don't be too quick to dismiss the know-it-all's ideas. Even though
her single-minded approach can be grating and degrading, she just might have the
knowledge or information you're seeking. (Hey, who knows, maybe the hunter model
was the right answer!)
- Make sure you have an ample supply of data when engaging one in
conversation. Guesswork, assumptions, estimates, and hunches won't be enough to hold
the know-it-all's attention, let alone to convince him of anything.
- If you're seeking information, frame your questions carefully.
Be specific about what you're asking. Otherwise, the person might go off on tangents-intelligent
tangents, but tangents nonetheless-which are frustrating and counterproductive.
- If you're in a group setting with a know-it-all, and you want
to get input from participants, go round-robin, with each person given an equal amount
of "airtime" to share his or her views.
- Avoid directly challenging a know-it-all's facts or interpretation
of the facts. Instead, try posing a question that can open her thinking. Example
of what not to say: "Your data from last quarter can't be right." Better:
"What are the sources of that data?" Better still: "What do you think
we can do to make sure our quarterly data is accurate and relevant?"
- Don't question or criticize the person's credentials. Even though
you might have good reason to do so -- and it might feel good in the short term--he's
likely to get angry, defensive, and even more difficult to work with in the long
term.
|
ABOUT THE
AUTHOR:
Tom Terez (TomTerez.com) is an international consultant and frequent
speaker on organizational performance (BetterWorkplaceNow.com) and personal excellence (InnerBest.com)
Copyright 2002
Crain Communications, Inc.
Copyright © 2008 Tom
Terez Workplace Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
P.O. Box 21444, Columbus, Ohio USA 43221-0444. Tel.
614-488-9721. Online Contact Form
Home |
Ideas
and Insights | Improvement
Tools | White
Papers | Reprint
Center | Talks,
Workshops, Consulting
| E-Letters | Contact | For Clients
Visit our other sites:...TomTerez.com...InnerBest.com
BetterWorkplaceNow.com, Better Workplace Now, TomTerez.com, InnerBest.com, and Inner
Best are trademarks of Tom Terez Workplace Solutions, Inc.
|
|